.
Feedback

Council Approves Smaller Garbage Rate Increase than Proposed

Enough residents spoke at Monday’s meeting to convince the council to eliminate the Hazardous Waste Collector contract for a 0.61% less rate increase.

 

It’s a nearly impossible battle to gain enough written protests from 50 percent + 1 of the population to stop a garbage rate increase. This increase was no different with only 65 written protests submitted to the city, according to Mike Gibbons of the .

But the city council voted to increase garbage rates by only 7.2 percent, 0.61 less than the anticipated 7.81 percent.

Rates will still increase depending on your garbage bin size:

Capacity Current Monthly Rate Proposed Rate Increase at 7.81%
Rate Increase at 7.2% Actual Rate Increases
20 gallons $10.30 81 cents 80 cents $11.10
32 gallons $24.73 $1.93 $1.78 $26.51
64 gallons $49.46 $3.86 $3.56 $53.02
96 gallons $74.18 $4.97* $4.15** $78.33

*not calculated at the 7.81% increase

**based on a subtraction of .61%

The council chose to eliminate the contract with Door-to-Door, a hazardous waste collector that would offer Redwood City residents unlimited use for hazardous waste disposal.

Residents like Laura Aiden spoke at the council meeting, pointing out that a hazardous waste facility exists at Tower Road in San Mateo. They argued that if they did needed to dispose of these materials, they could make the trek.

“This is an unneeded program,” Aiden said.

Other residents were concerned that the approximately $1 additional cost could increase to many more dollars in future years.

“It’s small now, but we’re tired of being nickel and dimed to death,” said Matt Reising, the treasurer of a homeowners’ association in Redwood City.

Councilmembers seriously absorbed these statements and ultimately decided that the additional 0.61 percent increase in this economy, though small now, was unnecessary.

“Your voices do count, and we will put off this rate increase until this service seems more necessary,” Councilmember Barbara Pierce said.

Mayor Alicia Aguirre also promised that the council would look at ways that contractors like Recology can reduce costs.

Currently eight of the 12 agencies that form the South Bay Waste Management Agency (SBWMA), the joint powers agency of which Redwood City is a partner, use Door-to-Door.

Cliff Feldman, the Recycling Programs Manager of SBWMA, said that more than 300 pounds of hazardous waste was collected from 4,000 households last year.

“It’s been a great success in the jurisdictions that use it,” he said.

Pierce noted the environmental merit and convenience of such a program, especially with the that sent three Recology employees to the hospital. However, she agreed with her fellow councilmembers that the contract would be an added payment for a service that residents did not want.

 

For more news about Redwood City and surrounding areas, including unincorporated San Mateo County, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.
Pat Barajas May 6, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I just saw your post about your missing dog and then the follow-up that you found him. I am so happyRead More for you. Thank goodness he was found. Best Pat
ana g May 5, 2013 at 10:52 pm
We found him! Thanks