.
Feedback

District’s $1.6M Surplus Won’t Go Far

The net gain of $2.1 million after the 2010-2011 school year is $1.6 million more than projected, but that doesn’t mean the district’s funding worries are over.

Despite $1.6 million more funding than projected, the is still facing an uphill funding battle.

$1.36 million is already earmarked for certain school programs, restoring employees who were laid off, and other costs. The rest will go into the district’s reserves.

“It’s technically a surplus, but it’s not an incredible amount of money,” said Chief Business Official Raul Parungao.

“We will take any money the state or federal government will give us, but they’re earmarked for specific purposes,” he added. “What we need is flexibility.”

And with budgets cuts of $2 million and $3 million coming in 2012-13 and 2013-14, the surplus will be used to keep reserve funds barely above the required 3 percent state minimum.

The $304,000 will reduce the cuts from $2 million in 2012-13 to $1.7 million, which will be used to save jobs, Parungao said.

The $304,000 came from the following savings and expenditures:

Reserve Funds Amount Savings from maintenance and operations budget $249,970 Changes in Special Education Revenue $137,279 Savings from utility costs $115,920 Increase in interest income $85,608 Savings from special ed budget $84,772 Increase in revenue from Medical Administrative Activities (MAA) $27,970 Changes in revenue limit $17,277 Changes in State revenues $12,515 Changes in expenditures -1,366 Changes in local revenue -$26,023 Reduction in special ed revenue from share in high cost pool  (Special Education Local Plan Area- SELPA) -399,882 Total Reserve $304,040

The district was able to cut maintenance and operations costs and reduce utilities bills to save a total of $366,000. The operations savings are put aside for facilities in emergency cases like the clean-up after the .

However, the state is threatening more mid-year cuts, which could come as early as January. If the state can raise $4 billion in revenue, school budgets will not be affected. Should the state not hit , further cuts will be made to school districts already operating with limited budgets.

If the state only raises $2 to 3 billion, there will be cuts to childcare programs, community colleges and higher education.

K-12 budgets would be affected if the revenue is less than $2 billion. These budgets would suffer $1.5 billion cuts, or $250 per student in the Redwood City School District. Perhaps most alarmingly, the school year could be cut up by another seven days, in addition to the five days that districts can cut from the typical 180 day school year.

“The money the district generates today may prevent any of these projected budget cuts in the future,” Parungao said.

 

Special Education and Miscellaneous Costs

The $304,000 reserve money is not as high as it could have been because the district received nearly $400,000 less from the county for special education services than anticipated.

However, should it cost a large sum of money to educate an individual special needs student, a local school district can apply for reimbursement from the county, which receives money from the federal government. Parungao said after a certain cost threshold, a school district is eligible for 100 percent reimbursement for a student’s education.

Another blow to the district’s budget was the . The Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) was passed to ensure that students with disabilities would receive fair and equal education, but the federal government does not have the money to give to school districts to ensure that this equality prevails.

The district received only $8.1 million from the federal government of the $15.3 million needed to educate these students. The district had to transfer $7.1 million from its General Fund to this Special Education fund.

“We are truly in need for these students, but the federal government does not provide the entire funding,” Parungao said.

If districts do not comply with these mandates, they could be sued, even though they have not received adequate funding.

**Like Redwood City Patch on Facebook and follow us on Twitter to receive the most up-to-date news.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.
Pat Barajas May 6, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I just saw your post about your missing dog and then the follow-up that you found him. I am so happyRead More for you. Thank goodness he was found. Best Pat
ana g May 5, 2013 at 10:52 pm
We found him! Thanks