.
Feedback

Supes Greenlight New Jail

Size and building grant approved, despite passionate opposition from one supervisor.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to move forward with plans to build in Redwood City, despite the staunch opposition of a supervisor.

Supervisors voted 4-1 to approve Sheriff Greg Munks' request to file an initial statement of interest on the county's behalf that enables him to apply for state grant money, which would be used to pay for some of the new jail's construction cost.


The board also selected, by a vote of 4-1, the proposed Option B jail model, which will hold between 488 and 552 beds for inmates.

In both cases, the sole vote in opposition was that of .

Do you support the new jail? Vote in .

Pine, who represents District 1, expressed concerns about the vigor with which the county has pursued the effort to build a new jail. The typically calm Pine became uncharacteristically animated when addressing his frustrations with what he perceived to be a lack of desire on behalf of the county to seriously look into alternative programs that could help former inmates become productive members of society.

"We have to reduce our reliance on incarceration," he said. "Our debate today has been about the jail. We have no plan in place and no money earmarked for new alternatives to reduce recidivism."

He said programs that have proven successful in helping former inmates transition from being behind bars into the free world are available, and that not enough research has been done on how these alternatives may help the residents of San Mateo County.
 
"We have to get serious about alternatives to incarceration," Pine said. 

The approved model includes constructing a transitional housing program as part of the jail that will help former inmates readjust back into society.

But no program has been selected yet by the Sheriff's Office, or the county. Sheriff Munks has said that decision will be made later, indicating that it could be operated by a non-profit organization, or some other outside entity.

Regarding other reasons for his opposition, building and running a new jail at a time when the county is struggling with ways to cope with a $50 million dollar structural deficit. The total cost of building the new jail is expected to be between $100 and $165 million, and the annual operating expense is projected to be about $44 million, according to a district report.

The grant that Sheriff Munks will apply for could result in the county being awarded as much as $100 million. If it is received, the county's jail-related debt could be reduced by almost 60 percent. But a local jurisdiction would be responsible for matching at least 10 percent of the total awarded amount, said the report.

The initial statement of interest is due October 21; formal applications are due January 11; and the grants will be awarded in February, according to updated information from the county.

Pine wanted the Sheriff to return back to the supervisors for a final approval before sending the formal application. His attempt to amend a motion that would require that extra step fell flat; no other supervisors supported the idea.

A defeated Pine eventually seemed to realize that he was fighting an uphill battle, and that his passionate message was falling on deaf ears. And though his message was applauded by jail critics who spoke at the meeting, ultimately his fellow supervisors overruled Pine's emotional appeal.

Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson, who represents District 4, said that though she see's Pine's perspective on some of his issues with the jail planning process, she approved of its construction to allow the the county to accommodate the influx of inmates coming from the state system to San Mateo County.

A state mandated went into effect October 1. It is expected that about 400 former inmates convicted of non-violent crimes currently in the state parole department will become the responsibility of the county's probation department.

Jacobs Gibson furthered her justification for the need to build the new jail, saying it will alleviate the overcrowding issues the county is experiencing in existing facilities.   San Mateo County has the second most overcrowded incarceration facilities in the state, operating with about 300 inmates more than the population capacity of 834 beds, according to Sheriff Munks.

The Option B jail model approved by the board allows for the construction of additional space in the jail facility that can be transformed into more beds for inmates should the overcrowding problem persist.

Meanwhile, Supervisors Carol Groom, Adrienne Tissier and Don were quite clear in their support to build the new jail.

The county east of Highway 101 on Chemical Way in Redwood City; the new jail will likely be built there.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.