.
Feedback

Ouch! Redwood City, Woodside Get Failing Grades for Tobacco Policies

The American Lung Association gave both Redwood City and Woodside grades of Ds and Fs for its tobacco policies.

The American Lung Association in California gave the city of Redwood City some pretty harsh, failing grades for its tobacco marks this week.

The annual report, which was released Wednesday, issues grades for all cities and counties in California on local tobacco control policies including those for smoke-free outdoor environments, smoke-free housing, and reducing sales of tobacco products.

Read comments by Redwood City residents from our Facebook page about their experiences with second-hand smoke at the end of this article.

Belmont remains the highest scoring city in the county thanks to the passage of a comprehensive secondhand smoke protections outdoors and in attached housing.  Belmont is only one ordinance away from achieving straight A’s - all it needs is to adopt a strong tobacco retailer license which would provide local control over the sale of tobacco products and thus reduce the illegal sale of tobacco to underage youth.

Overall, the association said the state of California "falls short in adequately funding tobacco prevention programs to protect children and curb tobacco-caused disease."

California earned an A grade for its smoke-free air policies but received a D for its low cigarette tax, an F for failing to adequately fund tobacco prevention and control programs, and another F for poor coverage of smoking cessation and treatment services.

"Cities and counties in California have always led the way with strong tobacco control policies, and that continues to this day," said Fred Lurmann, Chair of the Leadership Board of the American Lung Association in California – Greater Bay Area. "Safeguarding our communities from the negative consequences of tobacco is critical. The low grades represent real health consequences."

The association also criticized the state for not increasing its cigarette tax since 1999, and spending only 15 percent of what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends to adequately fund tobacco prevention programs and services to help people quit smoking.

There are about 3 million new youth smokers in the U.S. and 34,400 in California each year. About 37,000 deaths are caused by tobacco use annually, according to the U.S. Surgeon General.

"We need to do more to fight the influence of tobacco interests in California politics," said American Lung Association in California Chairwoman Marsha Ramos. "Our state-elected officials have an opportunity to change course in 2013 and make big strides in the fight to end tobacco-caused death and disease."

"It’s going to take a great deal of political will, but we are confident our elected officials are up to the challenge," she added. "Our children’s health is depending on them."

 

San Mateo County State of Tobacco Control 2013 Overall Grade Smokefree Outdoor Air Smokefree Housing Reducing Sales of Tobacco Prodcuts Atherton F F F F Belmont B A A F Burlingame D D D F Foster City
F F D F Half Moon Bay F F F F Hillsborough F F F F Menlo Park
C B C D Millbrae F F F D Pacifica C D F A Redwood City
D D F D San Bruno F F F D San Carlos D F D D San Mateo D D F D South San Francisco F F F D Woodside F F F F

To view the complete California report, visit www.lung.org/california.

Redwood City residents and business owners have been commenting on their experiences with second-hand smoke in town on our Facebook page.

Pablo Sanchez said, "I think [Redwood City] needs to ban cigarette smoking from apartment complexes. All my neighbors smoke cigarettes; [they're] chain smokers. I don't smoke cigarettes but my apartment smells like cigarettes all the time!"

Michelle Velasquez-Analla agreed, saying, "Yes! In front of my business there are cigarette butts on the sidewalk every morning. I am 99% sure they are coming from adults. It's yucky!"

Join the conversation by visiting and becoming a fan of RedwoodCity-Woodside Patch's Facebook page.

Do you think there are additional things Redwood City and Woodside should be doing as far as tobacco policies go? Tell us in the comments below.

 

Stay informed on the latest news from your local neighborhood - follow Patch!

Sign up for Redwood City-Woodside Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

Want to share your opinions with the communities of Redwood City and Woodside? Start your own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.