.
Feedback

Library Bequest Discussion Won't Appear on Council Agenda

Community member Sharon Levin tried to place the discussion on Monday's agenda, but the Mayor and Vice Mayor declined request.

One item on Monday’s agenda that will be absent is the further discussion of the allotment of a $225,000 library bequest that the Library Board recently discovered. Sharon Levin, a “Committee to Save Schaberg” member, requested that the item be placed on the agenda so a two-way discourse concerning the allocation of funds could take place.

Agenda item approval requires the consent of the Mayor and Vice Mayor, but Mayor Jeff Ira emailed Levin stating that “a subsequent mid-year appropriation regarding a one-time gift was recommended by the Library Director and Library Board and the .” Levin and other members of the committee said they wanted the money to extend Schaberg’s hours rather than for programming they believed could be done by volunteers.

Ira said that Levin could address the council at any time during the public comment period. However, Levin said that she wanted to place the item on the agenda in order to solicit feedback.

“If it were truly a good decision, then we want the council to be able to say why,” Levin said.  

But Ira explained that this was the Library Board’s decision and the council supported it.  

“We’re not going to second guess and challenge their decision,” he said. “Some residents are saying ‘the money’s there, so let’s use it to keep Schaberg open longer,’ but we can’t just spend all of the money from the bequest.”

He added that Levin could address the council in June when the 2011-2012 budget was being discussed, concerning residual funds from the bequest or any other budgetary items. At that meeting the council could engage in dialogue.

In February, the library board decided to close Schaberg on Monday in order to .

Response from Mayor Jeff Ira:

Dear Sharon

In regards to your additional questions on a discussion with Council on the library budget, the Council made the budget reduction decisions for the current fiscal year in June of 2010. A subsequent mid-year appropriation regarding a one-time gift was recommended by the Library Director and Library Board and the Council supports that decision. The Council will not be placing it on an agenda for further discussion or deliberation.  If you wish to speak to the Council on those decisions you may under public comment at any scheduled City Council meeting. In terms of any residual funds for the library or other budgetary decisions that may occur in the next fiscal year, you are welcome to come and speak to those at the budget hearings scheduled for June of 2011.  

That should clarify your questions regarding my previous email.

Thank you.

Jeff Ira

Mayor, Redwood City

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.