.
Feedback

Jerry Hill Introduces Bill to Require Breath Sample from Repeat DUI Offenders

The legislation requires ignition interlock devices on vehicles after a second DUI conviction.

Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, will introduce legislation Friday that would require ignition interlock devices for repeat DUI offenders, his office announced Thursday.

Hill will hold a news conference to announce the legislation Friday, along with the California Highway Patrol and other Peninsula law enforcement officers, that aims to crack down on drivers convicted of more than one DUI.

The bill would require an individual convicted of a second driving-under-the-influence offense to install and use an IID for one year and comply with IID calibrations every other month before full driving privileges are restored, according to Hill's office.

A third DUI conviction would result in IID installation and use for two years; a fourth or subsequent DUI conviction would require use of an IID for three years.

Hill will also call attention to DUI crackdowns and checkpoints conducted by Peninsula law enforcement departments.

The CHP and other public safety departments will offer details of their driver sobriety and safety programs, which are at their height during the holiday season.

The news conference will take place at 10 a.m. at the Redwood City's California Highway Patrol office, located at 355 Convention Way.

An ignition interlock device is connected to a vehicle’s ignition and requires a breath sample before the engine starts. The device prevents the car’s engine from starting if the device detects a blood alcohol level that exceeds a pre-set limit.

Under current state law, installation of IIDs is optional for repeat offenders. About 20 percent of those who have a choice of installing an IID or driving on a restricted license opt for IID installation.

Hill's legislation would require repeat DUI offenders to complete an IID program in addition to completing the DUI prevention course required by current law. Under current law, second-time DUI offenders must complete an 18-month DUI course; third-time offenders or more, a 30-month course. 

In 2009, the most recent year in which conviction data is available, there were 161,074 DUI convictions in California. Of those, 117,642 or 73 percent were first time offenders and 43,432 or 27 percent were repeat offenders. The same year, drunk drivers killed more than 1,200 people and injured 26,000 in California.

Earlier this month, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommended that all people convicted of drunk driving should have ignition interlock devices installed in their cars to prevent them from operating their vehicle while intoxicated. 

The NTSB said that legislation requiring ignition interlock even after the first DUI -- even for drivers who are "only a sip" over the legal limit -- could be a major factor in preventing collisions. Just two days ago, the day after Christmas, AAA joined the NTSB inn calling for IID installation for anyone convicted of drunk driving.

Currently, 17 states require ignition interlock devices for first-time DUI offenders and at least 24 states require IID's for repeat offenders.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) believes that IID's reduce recidivism by roughly 67 percent – a figure that also is cited by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mandating ignition interlocks is the CDC's top recommendation for reducing alcohol-related driving deaths, which account for about a third of all traffic fatalities, according to the agency.

As of this year, about 279,000 ignition interlock devices were installed and operating in the United States, including 24,000 in California.

According to data collected through New Mexico's IID program, recidivism rates were reduced by 75 percent for offenders in the program compared to non-participating offenders. The same study found that alcohol-involved crashes declined 31 percent between 2002 and 2007, according to statistics compiled by Richard Roth, executive director of Impact DWI.

In 2010, Hill authored Assembly Bill 1601, which authorized California judges to revoke licenses for repeat DUI offenders for up to 10 years. The law went into effect January 1, 2012 and has the potential to take as many as 10,000 drivers off the road each year.

In 2011, Hill authored Assembly Bill 45 to crack down on underage drinking on party buses. The law goes into effect January 1, 2013, and requires chaperones on party buses when passengers are age 21 or younger and enacts penalties for bus drivers and companies that don't comply.

 

Stay up-to-date on the latest local news and fabulous Patch contests - follow Patch!

Want to share your opinions with the communities of Redwood City and Woodside? Start your own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.