.
Feedback

Jail Realignment Plan to Receive Executive Vote

The Community Corrections Partnership will vote Thursday on sending the draft plan to the Executive Committee.

Since the state passed legislation in April 2011 to send 30,000 non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders and parolees to local jails, impassioned residents have vocalized their varying thoughts on how to deal with this realignment. The Sheriff’s Department has vehemently championed , while others believe rehabilitation programs and job programs will reduce the 70 percent recidivism rate rather than trying to house more inmates.

The County’s Parole department created the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) to include all these voices and opinions into its Local Implementation Plan, required from all counties. Forty-eight California counties’ Boards of Supervisors have already approved plans.

The county solicited community feedback at and a weeklong comment period in response to Gov. Jerry Brown's realignment bill AB 109. San Mateo County’s plan will appear before the Board on April 24.

The plan’s primary goal is to reduce crime and recidivism amongst the realigned inmates. The county also decided that the plan must:

  1. Protect public safety through appropriate custody, supervision, and law enforcement activities.
  2. Create opportunities for rehabilitation and recovery.
  3. Provide case management, substance abuse, mental health, vocational and housing support services

The plan aims to help individuals successfully reenter the community with the following three practices:

  1. Community-Based Supervision
  2. Community-Based Services
  3. In-Custody Supervision and Support

Since realignment began in October 2011, San Mateo County has received approximately 173 post-release community supervisees from the state system. The county expects the supervisee population to peak at 600 from October 2012 through April 2013.

It received $4.8 million in AB 109 programs and grant monies for 2011-2012.

Where Will the Money Come from?

The state didn’t even invite San Mateo County to apply for a portion of the $602 million for realignment, and instead selected 11 other larger counties that will receive more inmates from the state.

However, four Supervisors share the Sheriff’s urgency to construct a new 576-bed jail - rather than the initial, though less popular location downtown - to ease the overcrowding in the current jails and make room for the new inmates.

Sheriff Greg Munks argued that the county is “as close to shovel ready as anything in the state,” reported the San Mateo Daily Journal, in contrast to some counties that received state money but may hold off for years before constructing any facilities.

Munks explained his legal obligation to provide current inmates, particularly at the , better sanitary conditions. The Grand Jury has come down on San Mateo County for its overcapacity of inmates, a violation of their rights.

Assemblyman Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) is drafting legislation that would allow the state to shift money from building state facilities to building local jails.

Building trades have also supported the new jail, anticipating many new jobs. The county and Redwood City unemployment rate as of January 2012 - the latest figures - is 7.2 percent.

For more news about Redwood City and surrounding areas, including unincorporated San Mateo County, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook.

Get Patched in daily by signing up for our newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.
Pat Barajas May 6, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I just saw your post about your missing dog and then the follow-up that you found him. I am so happyRead More for you. Thank goodness he was found. Best Pat
ana g May 5, 2013 at 10:52 pm
We found him! Thanks