.
Feedback

High-Speed Rail Won’t Be Four Tracks on the Peninsula, Officials Hope

Legislation calls for limiting California high-speed rail on the Peninsula to two tracks along the Caltrain right-of-way, not four.

Local officials plan to create a safeguard requiring California high-speed rail to blend with Caltrain’s existing two track system when it whizzes through the Peninsula.

State Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) is unveiling legislation Friday at the Palo Alto Caltrain station that would close loopholes and ensure that money from Prop 1A, the high-speed bond measure approved by California voters in 2008, would be used to build a two-track blended system from San Francisco to San Jose. Funds originally allocated to the Peninsula segment cannot be transferred to other segments of the high-speed rail.

Over the past few years, local officials and hundreds of residents have expressed concerns about a four-track option through the Peninsula, in which the high-speed rail was designed to race along its own track.

Authority officials last year assured Hill that a four-track system would not be built when the senator helped strike a deal providing $705 million from high-speed bond money – that will be matched with local funds – to electrify Caltrain by 2019. With Caltrain electrified, high-speed rail could share the same existing tracks. 

“Caltrain electrification has been needed for years, but prior to the State's appropriation, obtaining funding was an obstacle,” said Jerry Hill in a statement.

The bill clarifies that the $1.1 billion appropriated by the legislature last year will include $600 million for Caltrain electrification.  Combined with an additional appropriation of $105 million for Caltrain’s advanced signaling system, the state has committed a total of $705 million for the Caltrain electrification project.

The switch to electric power will allow Caltrain to run faster, more frequent trains and accommodate increased ridership, Hill said. In addition to being quieter than current trains and reducing emissions by 90 percent, the increased ridership and revenue from an electrified system could reduce Caltrain's operating subsidy by almost 50 percent.

At the news conference, Caltrain officials will provide an update on the first phase of the electrification project.  The initial $40 million allocation is funding work on an advanced signaling system that will increase safety. 

 

Tell us in the comments below: Would you be okay with high-speed rail if it cruised along Caltrain's existing tracks? 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.