.
Feedback

Council Approves Using More Recycled Water

City could expand boundaries for using recycled water and sell some to neighboring cities.

Redwood City will look for creative ways to expand its use of recycled water, following orders given by city leaders on Monday night. 

A report presented at the City Council meeting by Superintendent Justin Ezell showed the city's water usage is well below the target the city has set for itself, which is in part because of the city's use of recycled water. 

Council members voted unanimously to move ahead with plans to expand where in the city recycled water could be used, and possibly to use it for limited purposes at schools and hospitals. 

The council instructed the city's Utility Commission to investigate ways to sell some of its recycled water to neighboring cities in the region that might be interested in purchasing it. 

Council unanimously approved the city's water plan by a 6-0 vote, as Mayor Jeff Ira was absent from the meeting. 

Much attention has been paid to water rates in cities across the Peninsula as the regional distributor, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, has begun charging cities more for water. 

The SFPUC is paying a share toward the construction project intended to improve the water transportation system from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in Yosemite National Park.

That cost has resulted in a rate hike to cities, which in turn have passed the burden onto their customers. 

The focus on water also is heightened by a new law requiring cities to decrease their water use 20 percent by 2020. 

But according to Ezell, Redwood City has met those requirements by using a unique combination of opportunities. Those include recycling water and offering water customers incentives for conservation. 

Ezell said now it is time for the city to press itself to find ways to expand on the opportunities already in place, such as its recycled water program. He said he would like to see the boundaries for recycled water moved into central Redwood City. 

As well, Ezell said he'd like to see schools and parks use recycled water for landscape irrigation purposes, which would save the city millions of gallons of water annually. 

Though the council was in favor of expanding the recycled water service area, some were tentative to apply its use in public areas. Some residents have expressed concern about potential health hazards caused by exposing children to recycled water. 

Councilman Jeff Gee said the city should hold off on using recycled water for irrigation in residential areas due to the health concerns of some community members. He suggested incentives for neighborhoods willing to use recycled water in their communities first, thus creating a pilot program toward more widespread use. 

Councilwoman Barbara Pierce agreed, and said the council should gather more resident support before expanding the use of recycled water into neighborhoods.

Ezell said that there are no reported cases of illness attributed to people being exposed to recycled water. He said is planning to use recycled water for its laundry service. 

Pierce said that while she is aware of the science behind the cleanliness and safety of recycled water, the community might not accept being exposed to it. 

"Battling people with science can sometimes be a useless effort, so i'm not willing to do that," said Pierce. 

Gee said he'd be willing to use recycled water for toilets and plumbing in parks and schools. But Gee said the city should look further into developing a business plan to sell recycled water to other cities in the region. 

"I think we should start planning a formula for a buy-in. I think we should get ready for that because demand will emerge," said Gee. 

Environmental advocate and former Palo Alto mayor Peter Drekmeier spoke during public comment to council members and praised Redwood City for its cutting edge approach to water conservation. 

"I want to thank Redwood City for being a leader," he said, and encouraged the city's leadership to move forward with expanding its use of recycled water. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.