Council Approves Using More Recycled Water

City could expand boundaries for using recycled water and sell some to neighboring cities.

Redwood City will look for creative ways to expand its use of recycled water, following orders given by city leaders on Monday night. 

A report presented at the City Council meeting by Superintendent Justin Ezell showed the city's water usage is well below the target the city has set for itself, which is in part because of the city's use of recycled water. 

Council members voted unanimously to move ahead with plans to expand where in the city recycled water could be used, and possibly to use it for limited purposes at schools and hospitals. 

The council instructed the city's Utility Commission to investigate ways to sell some of its recycled water to neighboring cities in the region that might be interested in purchasing it. 

Council unanimously approved the city's water plan by a 6-0 vote, as Mayor Jeff Ira was absent from the meeting. 

Much attention has been paid to water rates in cities across the Peninsula as the regional distributor, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, has begun charging cities more for water. 

The SFPUC is paying a share toward the construction project intended to improve the water transportation system from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in Yosemite National Park.

That cost has resulted in a rate hike to cities, which in turn have passed the burden onto their customers. 

The focus on water also is heightened by a new law requiring cities to decrease their water use 20 percent by 2020. 

But according to Ezell, Redwood City has met those requirements by using a unique combination of opportunities. Those include recycling water and offering water customers incentives for conservation. 

Ezell said now it is time for the city to press itself to find ways to expand on the opportunities already in place, such as its recycled water program. He said he would like to see the boundaries for recycled water moved into central Redwood City. 

As well, Ezell said he'd like to see schools and parks use recycled water for landscape irrigation purposes, which would save the city millions of gallons of water annually. 

Though the council was in favor of expanding the recycled water service area, some were tentative to apply its use in public areas. Some residents have expressed concern about potential health hazards caused by exposing children to recycled water. 

Councilman Jeff Gee said the city should hold off on using recycled water for irrigation in residential areas due to the health concerns of some community members. He suggested incentives for neighborhoods willing to use recycled water in their communities first, thus creating a pilot program toward more widespread use. 

Councilwoman Barbara Pierce agreed, and said the council should gather more resident support before expanding the use of recycled water into neighborhoods.

Ezell said that there are no reported cases of illness attributed to people being exposed to recycled water. He said is planning to use recycled water for its laundry service. 

Pierce said that while she is aware of the science behind the cleanliness and safety of recycled water, the community might not accept being exposed to it. 

"Battling people with science can sometimes be a useless effort, so i'm not willing to do that," said Pierce. 

Gee said he'd be willing to use recycled water for toilets and plumbing in parks and schools. But Gee said the city should look further into developing a business plan to sell recycled water to other cities in the region. 

"I think we should start planning a formula for a buy-in. I think we should get ready for that because demand will emerge," said Gee. 

Environmental advocate and former Palo Alto mayor Peter Drekmeier spoke during public comment to council members and praised Redwood City for its cutting edge approach to water conservation. 

"I want to thank Redwood City for being a leader," he said, and encouraged the city's leadership to move forward with expanding its use of recycled water. 

Sam June 15, 2011 at 01:20 AM
While it's true that serious conservation will result in slightly higher rates to urban consumers (because the fixed costs of a water delivery system are high), the real reason that rates for customers of SF's Hetchy Hetchy system are going up is entirely different. SF is currently in the midst of a massive $4.6 Billion upgrade/repair/deferred maintenance/etc/you name it?--- of its water system (which serves not just SF residents, but also millions of captive customers in San Mateo, Santa Clara and Alameda counties). When you sell bonds to borrow $4.6 Billion there are significant debt service costs down the road. How to pay that debt? Increase water rates. Now the $64 question -- why is SF having to spend $4.6 Billion to fix its system? Please go to -- http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/09/15/MN64957.DTL There you will find a great piece of 2002 journalism disclosing that starting with Dianne Feinstein a series of SF mayors diverted funds from needed Hetch Hetchy maintenance and capital improvement projects to their own politically motivated places. Now SF is playing "catch up" and Peninsula cities are paying the price. And yet, while Redwood City and others are seriously pursuing recycled water alternatives the City of San Francisco does absolutely no water recycling, but meanwhile raises the price of water sold to Peninsula cities that are doing some real recycling.
Reality Check June 15, 2011 at 05:39 PM
"Battling people with science can sometimes be a useless effort, so i'm not willing to do that," said Pierce. Why do educated intelligent people cow-tow to anti-science troglodytes? I guess we shouldn't worry about warming or carcinogens or much of anything since "the community might not accept that." In the case of recycled water hysteria, as Pierce and Gee know, "the community" refers largely to a group of predominately Redwood Shores residents who it appears were mostly of Asian descent. I guess the "feng shui" (or whatever) of recycled water sticks in their craw. Science be damned!
Jonelle Preisser June 16, 2011 at 07:15 PM
More Reality "Battling people with science can sometimes....." I couldn't help think of the Council's allowing Cargill to go ahead with their application to damage the health of SF Bay and all the ecological damage that goes along with that destruction. What about that science, Councilmember?
Reality Check June 16, 2011 at 07:36 PM
Yeah, the Saltworks "Cargillville" proposal to fill/pave the Bay and call it sustainable "infill" (literally!) transit-oriented growth is another excellent example of flying in the face of science. Getting back to recycled water issue ... tntentionally or not, the craven attitude Pierce (and other councilmembers come across with in this story unfortunately serves as another fine example of the much-decried "dumbing down of America." Of all people, you'd think wise elected leaders would show leadership based on well established science. If science doesn't drive or inform our decision-makers (it doesn't, obviously) and their decision-making, then what should? Feelings? Opinions? Fears? Superstition? Religion? Faith? At this rate we're doomed!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »