.
Feedback

Photos: What to Do with City Owned Parcels?

The city owns almost 250 parcels, some as small as 19 square feet to a few acres.

City staff presented an inventory of the city’s property at Monday night’s city council meeting. Of the 247 parcels they own, 30 looked promising.

Real estate on the Peninsula is particularly in demand and the city looked to the council for further feedback on the different avenues they were pursing. The council held a study session on February 27 moderated by a facilitator to discuss city-owned property and align the parcels with the city's General Plan, or city blueprint.

Community Development Director Bill Ekern presented six properties as examples of potential development for the private market place:

 

Land Description Initial Use Future steps Bradford Street area Cluster of adjacent parcels downtown across from Redwood City School District Affordable senior housing and day care project Still viable option, but city will issue Request for Proposals from developers Heller Street site Single lot near Jardin de Ninos Park in Middlefield neighborhood Affordable housing Current zoning allows a max. of 2 units, city will issue Request for Proposals from developers Perry Street lot Single lot downtown between Perry Street and Commercial Way Parking lot for west end of Broadway City will issue Request for Proposals from developers Jefferson Ave. Underpass area Two adjacent parcels on south side of Jefferson Avenue between railroad tracks and Franklin Street Complications because Transportation Authority (TA) funded 50% to buy parcels Staff advised business owner that there may be complications Maple Street/Harbor Area Two parcels on Maple Street Affordable housing Staff is planning a study session for June 25 Harrison Avenue site Triangle parcel on Harrison Ave. and Clinton St. "Squirrely piece of land" Could be sold to a developer for other use

Councilmember Barbara Pierce expressed concern about removing any existing parking lots, like the Perry Street lot.

“There is concern that the community could come unglued if we were to sell our parking lots,” Pierce said.

However, Vice Mayor Jeff Gee noted that this could be an opportunity to encourage increased use of public transportation and thus reduce the need for more parking. Mayor Alicia Aguirre also supported the selling of parking lots if that meant more in-fill housing, a use that the councilmembers agreed on.

Regarding the Inner Harbor land, Pierce encouraged staff to not only view the property as potential housing, but for recreational activities as well.

Vice Mayor Gee encouraged staff to “get creative” and consider all alternatives including land swaps, not just buying and selling.

Block 2 has been used as an example of what can result from the city issuing a Request for Proposals from developers. Multiple companies were interested, and the city narrowed the field down to .

But Ekern warned that, “Nothing is going to be simple should we decide to move these properties forward. There is a lot of work to clean up the parcels.”

What should the city do with each of these five properties? Tell us in the comments.

For more news about Redwood City and surrounding areas, including unincorporated San Mateo County, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily by signing up for our newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Merrily May 20, 2013 at 09:54 pm
That is a really good question, Bret! It has been a MIGHTY long time since we had a raise includingRead More even a cost of living increase!
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 05:19 pm
Good question, Bret.
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Bret Baird May 18, 2013 at 09:05 am
Thank you for posting this. As a teacher who represents 500 teachers, we routinely pay out of ourRead More own pockets to support our students.
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.
Pat Barajas May 6, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I just saw your post about your missing dog and then the follow-up that you found him. I am so happyRead More for you. Thank goodness he was found. Best Pat
ana g May 5, 2013 at 10:52 pm
We found him! Thanks