.

DID YOU KNOW That It Appears Like Redwood City Staff Don’t Want Floating Homes?

Docktown Floating Home Community in Redwood City, CA
Docktown Floating Home Community in Redwood City, CA

     Last year Redwood City government staff created an Inner Harbor visioning process (IHSP) for the express reason of gathering citizen input about what to do with the inner harbor but when the citizens start to coalesce around a park and floating community for the area the city decided to fight back. The city that is after all responsible for not dredging Redwood Creek and allowing a floating home community to grow and prosper for over fifty years reported the floating home community to the California State Lands Commission. This forced the California State Lands Commission that has also been complicit in allowing the community to grow and prosper for over fifty years to issue a letter to the city stating that the floating home community is in violation of the Public Trust designated use of the granted lands and therefore needs to be moved. The letter contains only broad statements.  Just right here in Redwood City at Pete’s Harbor residents were allowed and in a 1983 law the legislature expressly stated it was consistent with the public trust – and so it could be at Docktown.

     Not only did City staff report their own city but they also misrepresented the situation regarding the upland property owners’ willingness to work with the floating home community and the IHSP task force visioning process. The upland owners’ representative to the task force, Mr. Mike Brown, at the last task force meeting presented a proposal to swap some lands so as to allow a floating home community to stay.  Then he invited a group of floating home residents to meet with him and some representatives of a future potential development.   When he was asked about extending the existing lease to the city he mentioned there was some discussion of a one year extension. But instead the tenants have just received a long detailed letter from city staff telling them that the City cannot guarantee utilities past June 30th within a package that also included copies of the State Lands letter and a live-aboard contract that covers the period of July 1st 2013 to June 30, 2014.  Yes you did read the dates correctly it is basically retroactive and ends less than four months from now.

       Given the complicity of both the City of Redwood City and the California State Lands Commission let's assume for the moment a very worst case scenario for the tenants - a significant sunset period negotiation.  Or maybe it is time to sunset the State Lands Commission.   And even maybe revoke the charter of the City of Redwood City.  In a much more likely scenario we are just doomed to repeat the Sausalito Houseboat Wars even including the bit where the City cuts off the residents’ utilities.  They already cut my sewer.  Those who will not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  Are we witnessing the beginning of the Second Houseboat Wars?

 





This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 16, 2014 at 02:08 PM
Lee, thanks for your information and perspective. The article above was disconcerting as has most of this discussion. As usual you provide reasoned positions. What, specifically can reasonable citizens do to help?
Lee Callister March 16, 2014 at 02:34 PM
An important question. We hope people will encourage the City to think long term about the value of the Inner Harbor and what will make it a unique place we can all be proud of. The Inner Harbor task force is doing a pretty good job of that and the plan the consultants write and give to the city should reflect those discussions. There are some concerns that the City is rushing the process in favor of some preconceived ideas. There will be a period for public input once the draft plan has been presented to the council. We hope people will encourage the council to follow task force recommendations, and to support further discussion at the state level as to whether having Docktown here is a plus or minus. Obviously we feel strongly that we can be an asset to Redwood City, protecting the creek, and maintaining a lively maritime live and unique community that will attract visitors like the Houseboat communities in Sausaltio. We agree with maintaining a greenbelt park along the creek with a trail or boardwalk that connects the harbor with downtown, public access and recreation. I personally like Ernie's idea of some cute little shops and eating places and expect that to be included in the plan on some level.
Jim Clifford March 17, 2014 at 11:31 AM
Lee: I'm on board. How about a history of Docktown for the Journal of Local History? The County Museum just reopened its maritime gallery and there's a display about the Sequoia Yacht Club. Seems like a good time to make people aware of Docktown.
Lee Callister March 17, 2014 at 09:54 PM
Hi Jim Missed this post until now. Good idea, Jim. I'll look into it. I still owe you an article of two as well. Lee
Lee Callister March 25, 2014 at 03:42 PM
Just wanted to post a link to my latest Patch Post on Bridging Downtown and the Inner Harbor. http://redwoodcity-woodside.patch.com/groups/docktown-report/p/a-bridge-to-the-inner-harbor

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »