.
Feedback

Letter: Council Shouldn't Allow Ground Floor Office Space in Downtown

Residents Tiffany and Bret DiMarco said office spaces will create a "ghost town" feel once employees leave their buildings after work.

We were very disappointed to learn that the Redwood City Planning Commission approved a recommendation to amend the Downtown Precise Plan allowing ground floor office spaces in the downtown core and entertainment district.  

It's only been in the last several months that the "feel" of our downtown is heading in the right direction:  a mixture of retail, restaurants and entertainment that will draw the community.  

Is office space a part of an ideal downtown formula?  Absolutely!  But not along the main corridor.  

If you wander down University or California Avenues in Palo Alto, Laurel Street in San Carlos or Santa Cruz Avenue in Menlo Park you will see models of what we should be striving for.  Office space should occupy side streets and the second floor (and above) of multi-story buildings.  

Our downtown is already hampered by the major presence of many county buildings and services whose staff and clientele take up a mid-day, mid-week presence (parking and frequenting lunch locations) but vacates our downtown in the evenings and on the weekends.  Adding an additional office space presence along Broadway will only further a "ghost town" feel by creating dark, inactive storefronts that add no pedestrian draw in the evenings and on weekends.  

Everyone needs to be patient and stick to the original plan.  The Peninsula and Silicon Valley are on the cusp of another boom thanks to companies like Apple, Facebook, Zynga and others.  

Home prices and incomes are rising.  The rental market in San Francisco is very competitive; people are looking for attractive, affordable alternatives.  Redwood City could service this need by providing relatively "affordable" commercial and residential spaces AND a lively, appealing downtown atmosphere.

Finally, our home is within one mile of the downtown core.  Not only do we enjoy the proximity for our own use, but the state of the downtown reflects on our home value.  We've invested a considerable amount of money in our home and it is in our best interests, as well as the interests of our community, to see that the downtown grows into a thriving, attractive city center.  

We encourage you to vote AGAINST the Redwood City Planning Commissions' recommendation to amend the Downtown Precise Plan.

 

-- Bret and Tiffany DiMarco

 

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 11:35 am
Pamela, are you following a conversation that's taking place on Patch?
Linda Allen April 10, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Jennifer, thank you for all your wonderful work on Patch. Life is a journey and you're on yours.Read More It will be an amazing change for you and family. Real estate will definately be cheaper, which is my bigest gripe with rentals in the bay area. I wish you all the happiness you deserve. Linda Allen
Kate Ashley April 5, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Tot ziens en veel geluk Jennifer!
Jacqueline Whittier Kubicka April 5, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Jennifer: I really enjoyed working with you on the story about the Barnes family and Ballet AmericaRead More back in December. Also liked "following you around town" on the other stories you covered. There will be lots of great people and exciting news back east -- not to worry. Best of luck.
Buck Shaw March 31, 2013 at 01:15 pm
So why do you keep voting for bigger Government? Seems the consumers have solved the problemRead More without "It's" help.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm
This is a much more effective means for dealing with the issue. Legislation is not.
roberta peters March 31, 2013 at 12:26 am
I agree, the public has the right to know what they are eating. It is absurd to be purchasing foodRead More that contains GMOs and not be able to know it is in the food.... why the secret if it is so safe??? I will not shop at any food stores that refuse to provide the public with information on what I am eating or serving to the people I care about. Trader Joes and Whole Foods have my loyalty for having the courage to stand up against the big guys and set an example by doing what is right for the consumer and not folding to pressure from Monsanto, Dupont and the other corporate giants that could care less about our safety and only care about how much money they can rake in.