Video: New Bike Path May Come to Redwood City

Matthew Self says a 1.7 mile bike and pedestrian path on the Hetch Hetchy right-of-way will connect Redwood City through recreation and healthy living.

Longtime Redwood City resident Matthew Self recounts childhood memories of adventure and freedom when he would race by bike to the nearby scenic Alpine Trail.

The trail, which is now considered in significant need of improvements, was a source of release and enjoyment throughout Self’s adolescence.

“I just found that to be so liberating, to be able to ride all over the place,” he said.

This nostalgia and want to utilize unused land for the betterment of the local community has inspired Self to take on a project proposing a new “linear park” along the Hetch Hetchy right-of-way.

The proposed recreation and bike path would make use of 1.7 miles of unused space parallel to Alameda De Las Pulgas between Woodside and Edgewood Roads and would span the length of Redwood City.  

“The great thing about the linear park is it kind of comes to you and your neighborhood,” Self said. “It will literally go from city limits to city limits.”

Self said he envisions neighborhoods becoming connected through the trail that would connect Garret and Westwood Parks.

“You can take a walk or a ride or a jog and have a great family outing,” Self said.

In late February, Self created a website for the proposed park, currently named the West Side Park and Path, in order to promote the idea to fellow locals.

The website began with the belief he would start a letter writing campaign to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, which currently owns the land of the Hetch Hetchy right-of-way.

His feedback has been hugely positive, he said.

Self believes the idea came in perfect time as the SFPUC has recently become more receptive of local proposals, he said, and the Parks department has been toying with ideas for the land for about a year.

“It’s really reenergized them,” Self said of the West Side Park and Path.

According to Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Service Chris Beth, Self’s visions are in the early stages of consideration as the Parks Commission is set to meet with SFPUC at the end of April in order to negotiate costs and agreements.

Self cited the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, which calls for for projects to receive Measure A funds every two years, as a potential source of funding.

His estimation of total costs for the project is approximately $1.5 million.

Other potential uses of the land, Beth said, include a community garden and integrating the space into a trail system.

Self, who presented his proposal to the Parks Commission Wednesday night, said multiple proposals could be incorporated into West Side Park and Path.

“The linear park can encompass all those ideas,” he said. “The city can define what the uses would be.”

According to Self, the park would benefit local transportation, recreation, health and local businesses.

As the trail ends at the local businesses, including and , would have increased foot traffic.

Using bike as a mode of transportation, Self said, would develop community connections, safe routes to schools, possible alleviate traffic congestion and promote a healthy lifestyle.

“They’re not using their car and they’re also getting some exercise,” Self said.

The next steps in the process to making his vision a reality include negotiations with the SFPUC, approval by the Parks Commission and community outreach.

Self hopes that the inclusivity and many advantages of the West Side Park and Path will make final decisions obvious.

“In the long run,” he said. “This could have a big affect.”

For more news about Redwood City and surrounding areas, including unincorporated San Mateo County, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Get Patched in daily by signing up for our newsletter.

Jennifer Tegnerud March 30, 2012 at 02:04 PM
That would be so awesome! I currently walk and push my baby in her stroller up James and in and around the fenced off area up to Brewster, and over to Oak Knoll and I was just thinking the other day how nice it would be if they paved a path on that space for roller bladers and strollers and bikes, because quite honestly the side walks are pretty bumpy for a stroller from tree routes and lack of maintenance. I whole heatedly support this endeavor! With all the hills it would be almost comparable to the Dish route! A great workout!
Jack Hickey March 30, 2012 at 02:40 PM
It's about time!
Buck Shaw March 30, 2012 at 03:16 PM
Cross walks between sections? Conservation Easements for the animals? Handycap curbs? Safety rails on steep parts? Erosion control on the hills so soil doesn't run into streets or sidewalks? Local gardens poluting the land with Chemicals? Trash collection? Safe Routes to school must be publicly funded. Weed Abatement? Oh! and you left out Sustainable, Green, recycle, and Partnering. Other wise its a great Idea? I'm all for it.
Jack Hickey March 30, 2012 at 04:28 PM
Buck, are you saying that the process is convoluted? LOL "That government is best which governs least" Thoreau While we're at it, why don't we ask SFPUC (once again) to follow through on their "Grant of Scenic and Recreation Easement" dated January 15, 1969, which stated: "The foregoing grant and restrictions are made in consideration of and accepted subject to the express condition that the California Highway Commission shall have adopted that portion of the route for the Junipero Serra Freeway (I280) traversing lands of the Grantor south of Ralston Avenue as hereinbefore provided..." This added a 1 mile round trip addition to the I280 commute.
Jack Hickey March 30, 2012 at 04:44 PM
That Grant also included: "Recreational uses shall be compatible with... Exhibit 'B'" Exhibit 'B'" (March 1968) is: ____________________Preservation And Recreation Concepts ________________________Peninsula Watershed Lands ______________________San Francisco Water Department by_____________________Wilsey & Ham, Metcalf & Eddy, _____________________________Consultants Item: Active Recreation "The planning calls for the development of several facilities for Active Recreation including...a golf driving range, two short golf courses, and a championship 18-hole golf course with other associated recreational facilities in the vicinity."
commuter March 30, 2012 at 05:37 PM
This bike path is a great idea. The Stevens Creek Trail in Mountain View is hugely successful, both for commuters and recreational users. The city needs to be extremely careful with road crossings, though. The Stevens Creek Trail originally had one road crossing at busy Moffet Blvd, but after several serious incidents caused by cars running red lights, the city decided to build a bridge over the road instead.
Joshua Parker March 30, 2012 at 05:40 PM
I love this idea! The town I grew up in replaced the obsolete railroad with a bike path that is widely used by the people in the town. I think it would be great!
Rick Hunter March 30, 2012 at 07:05 PM
Great idea, Matthew and Chris! My hat's off to you for coming up with it and for the work you've done so far. It will be important to get the SFPUC to open the gate at Emerald Market so the hikers and bikers can actually get to the shopping area. I'm convinced that SFPUC's narrow-minded refusal to allow access was partially responsible for Emerald Market going out of business.
Matthew Self March 31, 2012 at 06:23 PM
Thanks, Rick. I agree that the first priority would be enable public access to the space by opening that gate, as well as creating openings in the fences at Garret Park and a couple of other spots. Most of the right-of-way is already open to the public anyway, so why block it off at a few spots?
Matthew Self March 31, 2012 at 06:32 PM
Yes, this is an important concern. Most of the street crossings are very low traffic and the Transportation department has already taken a look at those. But at Farm Hill Blvd, the path would divert over to the existing signal at the Jefferson intersection. There is also an (unrelated) plan to put Farm Hill Blvd on a "road diet" and reduce it from four lanes to two, which would make that crossing safer.
Judy Cronin April 01, 2012 at 04:00 AM
Thank you Matthew for taking the initative on this. it's a great idea.
Mac Hart April 01, 2012 at 04:08 AM
Matthew, Thanks so much for taking the initiative on this project. I am interested in hearing your thoughts on funding this block by block instead of the whole 1.7 mile stretch at once. It seems that a few blocks would be particularly challenging and costly to construct due to their steepness (Jefferson-McGarvey, Glenwood-Highlands) while most of the relatively flat blocks might be easier and cheaper to complete without the steep blocks included. Awesome idea!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something