.
Feedback

Design for New Apartments at Old Mel's Bowl Site Revealed

The name chosen for the new community is a tribute to the site's past.

Another new apartment development in Redwood City is moving along the path to completion. 

Tuesday, the San Ramon-based development firm SummerHill Apartment Communities revealed the design of the new 141-unit community that will soon occupy the former site of Mel's Bowl at 2580 El Camino Real in Redwood City. KTGY Group is the architect for the new community. 

The parties say they chose a special name for the apartment community that is "a nod to the site's past" and how it once housed a beloved local bowling alley - "The Lane On the Boulevard."

In a press release Tuesday KTGY and SummerHill said the 141 apartments will be "architecturally distinctive, wrap-style buildings" of three and four stories, featuring one- and two-bedroom apartments that are between 705 to 1,106 square feet.

Amenities will include "convenient resident access via same-level parking, a clubroom, a fitness studio, a swimming pool with spa, an outdoor kitchen and fireplace, bicycle storage, and a pedestrian path surrounding the property."

"The apartment homes will be energy- and water-efficient and will include gourmet kitchens with stainless steel appliances and European-style cabinetry, and in-unit washers and dryers," representatives said. "The Lane apartment community will include alternative transportation amenities such as bicycle storage facilities, electric vehicle charging stations and provisions for car-sharing vehicles."

The project's lead designer, Jessica Musick, said the community will target "young professionals working in Redwood City as well as surrounding upscale communities such as Palo Alto or Menlo Park, who want to live close to work but can’t afford the price tag that comes with a Palo Alto or Menlo Park zip code."

Redwood City Mayor Alicia Aguirre told Patch she is particularly excited that The Lane On the Boulevard will include five "median-income units."

Following San Mateo County Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines, the special units will be rented to singles or families who make between 80 and 100 percent of the HUD income limits set forth for 2013.

The income range for a single person is between $59,100 and $73,875 annually. The range for a family of four is between $84,400 and $105,500 annually.

See a table of HUD's income limits for special housing online here, or in the downloadable PDF document included in the photos section of this article.

Mayor Aguirre also praised the project's design and said how glad she is that the community is close by a service-rich area full of shops, restaurants and public transportation.

"We’re really excited about this new development. It’s an excellent design - something we might call 'urban sophisticated' – and it’s designed to be a good fit with the surrounding neighborhood," she said. "It includes some nice, wider sidewalks, and a small public plaza-like area at the front, making good use of the Hetch Hetchy water pipeline right-of-way."

"These 141 new units will be a very nice addition to our rapidly-expanding housing stock in Redwood City," she added.

SummerHill representatives also said they plan to make a wide range of community improvements in addition to those within their own 2.51 acres.

"The scope of the project includes improvements to surrounding sidewalks, the El Camino Real and Northumberland Street intersection, and storefront upgrades for six nearby property owners and tenants," Musick noted.

"El Camino Real has been a focus for development for many Peninsula cities, and KTGY is happy to be part of several developments shaping this historic street," said KTGY Principal Architect David Senden. "This project really exemplifies the goals of the Grand Boulevard Initiative.”

The Grand Boulevard Initiative is a regional collaboration dedicated to the revitalization of the El Camino Corridor as it runs through San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.

Redwood City Planning Commission Chairman Ernie Schmidt said he is also pleased with the upcoming project.

"I believe that anytime we can make available residential units that are not only close to downtown, but walkable to restaurants, stores and transportation, that is a good thing," he told Patch.

According to KTGY and SummerHill, pre-leasing is expected to begin in early 2014, and the first apartment homes are slated to open in summer 2014.

Prospective residents will be able to visit www.shapartments.com for more information about The Lane On the Boulevard once pre-leasing begins.

See an artist's rendering of the design for The Lane On the Boulevard in the photos section above.

PATCH WANTS TO KNOW - What do you think of the new development? Tell us in the comments below.

Also on RedwoodCity-Woodside Patch:

  • '201 Marshall' Will Feature 116 Apartments Designed for Commuters
  • Redwood City Real Estate: SOLD
  • Bike Sharing Program Coming to Redwood City
  • Man Who Tricked Local Elderly Into Giving Him Money Arrested
  • Electronic Arts' CEO Resigns Amid Missed Revenue Goals
  • 12 Arrested for Buying Alcohol for Minors

Stay informed on the latest news and events in your local neighborhood - follow Patch!

Sign up for Redwood City-Woodside Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

Want to share your opinions with the communities of Redwood City and Woodside? Start your own blog here.


Michael C Peterson March 20, 2013 at 12:06 pm
I love negative people, it makes the day so dreary, I'm going to miss Mel's Bowl, but we need housing for the growing peninsula area and the growth of Pete's Harbor. Redwood City needs the tax dollars.
TGD March 20, 2013 at 12:26 pm
"and no affordable housing"
I wouldn't be surprized if the affordable housing requirements included the soon to be low income residents living in the new jail.
TGD March 20, 2013 at 12:32 pm
"The Lane On the Boulevard."
How about "A Room with a View of My Happy Place"
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 20, 2013 at 12:56 pm
Well said Michael, and kudos for using your real name.
Merrily March 20, 2013 at 02:18 pm
Redwood City doesn't have to be the ONLY town building housing for the "much needed peninsula housing market"! Lots of empty lots in Menlo Park (for decades) but they do not think they need to take care the peninsula's problems!
TGD March 20, 2013 at 02:24 pm
"kudos for using your real name."
That's the same thing my invisible internet girlfriend said.
Susan Swope March 20, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Five "median-income units" out of 141 total units? Seems paltry to me. Sounds as if the remaining 136 will be market value. What about any low-income units?
Occupy Redwood City March 20, 2013 at 04:21 pm
It's ironic that this blatantly fallacious premise, that the use of a real name on the internet somehow bestows credibility, is coming from Mr. Covey, who from what we have heard from the RWC community is seen as a spin doctor for various local bigwigs and special interests.
Occupy Redwood City March 20, 2013 at 04:28 pm
Susan, you are exactly right. Five out of 141 units is only about 3.5%.
And it's really a shame that the mayor is this excited about five median-income units. As mayor she should realize that "median income" means something very different in San Mateo County than it does elsewhere, meaning that those precious few units will still be out of the reach of the large majority of working people. It's a nice token but it doesn't address RWC's need for affordable units. On page 41 of the City's own five-year consolidated plan, it states: "There is a high to critical priority need for affordable housing. The highest need is for the lowest-income groups. Housing market trends support this as a high need, with the need for housing affordable to extremely low‐income households the highest need" http://www.redwoodcity.org/phed/housing/pdf/RWC_ConPlan.pdf Mel's Bowl doesn't address this acknowledged need at all, as ORWC expressed to the City Council repeatedly in meetings over a year ago.
Kristopher Rowberry March 20, 2013 at 04:34 pm
Sorry to add to the "downer" posts - but having the developer GRACIOUSLY re-name the apartments to nod at the previous tenant of the land is kind of insulting.
It's similar to "Frontier VIllage" in San Jose. Bulldozed and made into condos. But the developer was "kind" enough to name the condos after the park. At least people got enjoyment out of the bowling alley...
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 20, 2013 at 07:32 pm
Merrily, Menlo Park has a couple thousand housing units going up on the side of the bay.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 20, 2013 at 07:34 pm
Only by you guys ORC. And your version of reality is highly suspect. But do you have an actual comment for the topic or are you just trolling me?
Victor Torreano March 21, 2013 at 01:50 pm
The five median income units were only put on the table as a weak attempt to nuetralize the two issues being labor and affordable housing. Labor's compliant of the developer not using area standard wages and the lack of local hiring members of the community and the affordable housing's complaint of not being present at all.
Five was enough for the city to approve.
Michael Craig March 21, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Is it just me, or does this drawing look more like a professional office building than a cozy apartment complex?
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 02:54 pm
Victor, as I remember, the city found they had absolutely no leverage to tell the developer how many "affordable" units he had to add. The city is obligated to approve housing that meets with the development statutes and guidelines the city imposes. The Mel's Bowl development met and exceeded those requirements. The developer offered the five units without coercion rom the city, but to answer complaints from activists. I remember Jeff Ira commenting that the city may need to establish affordable housing guidelines for new developments, but that they have to make sure that they are not so strict as to deter developers from considering projects in Redwood City. That's a discussion the community needs to have.
Victor Torreano March 21, 2013 at 05:13 pm
There are five of these type of projects currently underway (and more coming) in Redwood City. Why can these same developers / REIT's seem to comply with the community's wishes in San Francisco when it comes to these issues and not down on the peninsula?
The diffrence is in the standard that the developers are held.
dorothea March 21, 2013 at 06:59 pm
where's the "boulevard" and the lane out there right now is a traffic jam half
the day. do you know how old you have to be to even have bowled there ? once again redwood city.... tacky.
James Lee March 21, 2013 at 09:10 pm
"The difference is in the standards that the developers are held to."
Precisely.
COH March 21, 2013 at 09:21 pm
Michael - I was thinking the same thing. It looks like a doctor's office complex. No charm, no character. NOTHING like the surrounding area.
COH March 21, 2013 at 09:29 pm
I want to know what Redwood City is going to do about the horrific traffic that will get even WORSE. Did anyone do a traffic impact report? LAtely, ElC is a parking lot through Menlo - opens up through Atherton where there are three lanes - then become a bottleneck goiong through REDCY. TOO many signals that are not coordinated between Dumbarton & San Carlos. Woodside will be MORE of a nightrmare. And those who know the Marsh Road way, will back up Marsh Road like crazy. I alway go through Menlo/Atherton's Fair Oaks @ the hand car wash - or off Bay - and so will everyone else. I NEVER go near Marsh or Woodside at any traffic times. If I have to go on a freeway, I cut through Atherton to 280. It can take a half hour just to get to 101 from El Camino in the mornings. And the Woodside Road bridge over the train tracks is in deplorable condition.
TGD March 21, 2013 at 10:00 pm
"do you know how old you have to be to even have bowled there ?"
Bowling is an activity done inbetween ordering drinks. I always wondered if the watered down $2 highballs were standardized for bowling alleys by Brunswick. I grew up near Woodside Bowl and people always came wobbling out of that place.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 10:02 pm
Yes, the standards are very different in San Francisco, but San Francisco government has much more leeway in giving in to developers, as in the sweetheart deal cut for Twitter.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 10:03 pm
Absolutely different. The surrounding area are condominiums, a lap dance parlor and low-cost hotels. I think the goal is to improve the look of the immediate area.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 10:04 pm
El Camino is considered the boulevard, as in the Grand Boulevard Initiative.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 10:05 pm
It's going to get bad no matter what. MEnlo Park is in the process of putting 2000 residential units along Marsh Road and at the end of Haven.
TGD March 21, 2013 at 11:11 pm
"Why can these same developers / REIT's seem to comply with the community's wishes in San Francisco when it comes to these issues and not down on the peninsula?"
San Francisco has always played by their own rules and most construction projects are revamping existing structures as apposed to new.
TGD March 21, 2013 at 11:12 pm
"The diffrence is in the standard that the developers are held"
Yes and no. Since (as I mentioned before) most SF projects are to existing structures they already collect their taxes on that location and it can't effectively be used as a bargining point for a "take it or leave it" development so the city doesn't risk losing any substantual tax revenue, only permit and compliance fees (generally). On the peninsula, for a ground up project the developer has the leverage to tell the city/county it will locate it's project elsewhere unless it's costs (construction/taxes) are acceptable. The city/county usually complies in order to secure the revenue.
TGD March 21, 2013 at 11:13 pm
Up until recently I helped a friend bid many of these projects and I became extremely familiar with the construction details. Virtually all projects that are built to sell will be designed to keep the construction costs down and hence asthetics can suffer. The apartment project at 640 Veterans is of the same basic design but with more landscaping and many structure lines set on diagonal angles, but similar to this project.
The projects that incorporate much more elaborate designs are the public projects (ones that were funded mostly by stimulus money), or large corporate facilities used by them. There were many times when I reviewed a school improvement project and said "How do they justify the expense of the high end asthetic materials for this?" It is justified by the fact the projects funding is predetermined so they spend it all.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive March 21, 2013 at 11:35 pm
That's the most lucid explanation on development I've ever heard.
TGD March 22, 2013 at 12:15 am
Lou (if that's your real name....Just kidding) I could go on for days about the construction business, but I'll tell you my take on why many projects you hear about always end up costing substantually more than the original quote.
Big commercial contracting is a very competitive business. In order to get jobs you need to be the low bidder (always) and that usually means bidding a project and hope you get it and don't go broke and starve when you do. If you land 1 in 50 bids you are doing pretty good. So initial bids are below basement pricing with the hopes their will be enough change orders during construction that you can make some profit. So the easy answer for cost overruns usually occurs because of construction changes. The worst nightmare for an ongoing project? Uncovering an ancient burial site.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redwood City-Woodside Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Vanessa Castañeda (Editor) June 14, 2013 at 01:28 pm
Good question, cipiazza. This is probably related to a sewage pipeline replacement project takingRead More place nearby.
Alison Madden June 16, 2013 at 07:33 pm
Vanessa and ctpiazza, Buckley Stone at Pete's Harbor says it is because some time ago the CityRead More dredged near muni and ran a pipe under to spill it out at Bair Island, so it is actually the remains of rotting sea life. He knows so much about this area having been at Pete's for 20 years and knowing so much about the area the tides and the nature and land around here.